Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

[Oliver Pinter]

i reverted this commit 7d699bafe258ebd8f9b4ec182c554200b369a504 , and
now compile ...

On 2/5/08, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn().  I assume that you were
> using
> > ub.c in 2.6.23 and that it worked OK?  If so, we broke it, possibly via
> > changes to the core block layer.
> >
> > I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage.  If so,
> > perhaps we should remove or disble ub.c?
>
> Actually I think it may be an argument for keeping ub, if ub exposes
> a bug in the __blk_end_request. I'll look at the head of the thread
> and see if Mr. Pinter has hit anything related to Mr. Ueda's work.
>
> -- Pete
>


-- 
Thanks,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/