Re: Coexistence of EXPORT_SYMBOL() and __cpuinit

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Tue Feb 05 2008 - 18:50:27 EST


On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:13:18 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:49:24AM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote:
> > In kernel/cpu.c, there exists API that is declared as __cpuinit, and
> > at the same time exported via EXPORT_SYMBOL().
> >
> > Can these two attribute coexists at the same time? I mean, when it
> > is declared with EXPORT_SYMBOL, according to include/linux/module.h,
> > it is placed in a __ksymtab section, and when compiled with with
> > __cpuinit, according to include/linux/init.h, into a __cpuinit
> > section.
>
> kbuild.git contains a commit so we no longer warn about
> symbols being exported if annotatated with __cpuinit, __devinit, and
> __devinit.

but why? Is this just to reduce the volume of output, even though
exported __init symbols are a problem waiting to happen?


> I've requested Linus to pull the changes and expet it to happen
> within the next two days.


---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/