Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only

[Adrian Bunk]

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:34:23PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> David Newall wrote:
>> That being said, a module can be written such that it only dynamically 
>> links with the kernel.  Ndiswrapper is an example of how this can be 
>> done: None of the drivers that work under ndiswrapper make any direct 
>> use of the kernel, not in any way, indeed a wrapper could be written 
>> for a different operating system.
>
> The issue is all about "derivative works" in copyright law.
>
> Ndiswrapper is in a good position because the closed-source drivers were  
> originally written for another OS so it's pretty well impossible to  
> argue that they are derived from linux.
>...

IANAL, but when looking at the "But when you distribute the same 
sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the 
distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License" of the 
GPLv2 I would still consult a lawyer before e.g. selling a laptop with a 
closed-source driver loaded through ndiswrapper.

> Chris

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/