Re: [git pull] more SLUB updates for 2.6.25

[Eric Dumazet]

Nick Piggin a écrit :
> On Friday 08 February 2008 13:13, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/christoph/vm.git slub-linus
> >
> > (includes the cmpxchg_local fastpath since the cmpxchg_local work
> > by Matheiu is in now, and the non atomic unlock by Nick. Verified that
> > this is not doing any harm after some other patches had been removed.
>
> Ah, good. I think it is always a good thing to be able to remove atomics.
> They place quite a bit of burden on the CPU, especially x86 where it also
> has implicit memory ordering semantics (although x86 can speculatively
> get around much of the problem, it's obviously worse than no restriction)
>
> Even if perhaps some cache coherency or timing quirk makes the non-atomic
> version slower (all else being equal), then I'd still say that the non
> atomic version should be preferred.

What about IRQ masking then ?

Many CPU pay high cost for cli/sti pair...

And SLAB/SLUB allocators, even if only used from process context, want to 
disable/re-enable interrupts...

I understand kmalloc() want generic pools, but dedicated pools could avoid 
this cli/sti

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/