Re: [PATCH], issue EOI to APIC prior to calling crash_kexec indie_nmi path

[Neil Horman]

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:24:04PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Ingo noted a few posts down the nmi_exit doesn't actually write to the 
> > APIC EOI register, so yeah, I agree, its bogus (and I apologize, I 
> > should have checked that more carefully).  Nevertheless, this patch 
> > consistently allowed a hangning machine to boot through an Nmi lockup.  
> > So I'm forced to wonder whats going on then that this patch helps 
> > with.  perhaps its a just a very fragile timing issue, I'll need to 
> > look more closely.
> 
> try a dummy iret, something like:
> 
>   asm volatile ("pushf; push $1f; iret; 1: \n");
> 
> to get the CPU out of its 'nested NMI' state. (totally untested)
> 
> the idea is to push down an iret frame to the kernel stack that will 
> just jump to the next instruction and gets it out of the NMI nesting. 
> Note: interrupts will/must still be disabled, despite the iret. (the 
> ordering of the pushes might be wrong, we might need more than that for 
> a valid iret, etc. etc.)
> 
> 	Ingo

Just tried this experiment and it met with success.  Executing a dummy iret
instruction got us to boot the kdump kernel successfully.  

Thoughts on how we should handle this from here?


Regards
Neil

-- 
/****************************************************
 * Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 * Software Engineer, Red Hat
 ****************************************************/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/