[PATCH] stable_kernel_rules: fix must already be in mainline

[Stefan Richter]

On  7 Feb, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:24:57PM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
>> > > We've had multiple reports of it, and multiple confirmations that
>> > > the patch in the link above fixes the problem.....
>> > 
>> > I didn't think it was in Linus's tree yet.  Is it?
>> 
>> Not yet - it's in the pipeline. I'll see if that can be sped
>> up (someone else usually takes care of the pushes to Linus).
> 
> Then we did our job right and didn't take it :)
> 
> Please resend it after it gets into Linus's tree, not before, I'm really
> tired of checking for these things constantly...

----------------
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

stable_kernel_rules: fix must already be in mainline

Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.24-git19/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-git19.orig/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
+++ linux-2.6.24-git19/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
@@ -16,8 +16,9 @@ Rules on what kind of patches are accept
    race can be exploited is also provided.
  - It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
    whitespace cleanups, etc).
- - It must be accepted by the relevant subsystem maintainer.
  - It must follow the Documentation/SubmittingPatches rules.
+ - It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree.  Quote the
+   respective commit ID in Linus' tree in your patch submission to -stable.
 
 
 Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree:
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ Procedure for submitting patches to the 
    queue, or a NAK if the patch is rejected.  This response might take a few
    days, according to the developer's schedules.
  - If accepted, the patch will be added to the -stable queue, for review by
-   other developers.
+   other developers and by the relevant subsystem maintainer.
  - Security patches should not be sent to this alias, but instead to the
    documented security@xxxxxxxxxx address.
 

-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --=- -=---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/