Re: [PATCH] Documenting patch tags yet one more time

[Stefan Richter]

Paul Jackson would like to:
> explain more clearly that PATCH's
> should start off, right from the top or after the initial From: line if
> present, with:
> 
>   - The body of the explanation, which will be copied to the
>     permanent changelog to describe this patch.
> 
> rather than opening with ephemeral reactions to the discussion of the
> moment which will make little "sense to a competent reader who has long
> since forgotten the immediate details of the discussion that might have
> led to this patch."
> 
> As best my legalistic mind understands the patch format, such ephemeral
> reactions should go after the "---" marker line, in the same section as
> the diffstat would be placed.
> 
> Or perhaps the patch format should be changed in this regard, since it
> is cumbersome and unnatural to embed the ephemeral opening comments
> half way down the patch, rather than opening with them.

In common practice, the changelog does not start before the _last_ From:
line (rather than the initial From: line).

	ephemera
	From: author
	changelog
	tags
	changelog, continued
	tags
	---
	ephemera, diffstat
	diff
	ephemera

There may be a Date: somewhere before the changelog as well.  The first
line of the changelog is the one to appear in shortlogs.  It may be
preceded by Subject:.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --=- -=--=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/