Re: [git pull] kgdb light, v5

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Maybe, maybe not. I followed the comment in the original code, saying 
> that we need word-wise access for I/O memory poking. Can I assume 
> across a all archs that __copy_to/from_user will not perform byte 
> accesses if count is 2, 4, or 8? I would be glad if we can kill other 
> couple of line.

those architectures should extend mm/maccess.c accordingly. It's now the 
collector point for "weird kernel-owned memory access functionality".

> Ingo, if you are close to an editor, please pick those up? Here are 
> some offline things cooking on my side...

yeah, fixed these in my tree.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/