[PATCH 8/8] Move RODATA and NX tests to tests/

From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
Date: Mon Feb 11 2008 - 05:52:18 EST


From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@xxxxxxxxxx>

Move RODATA and NX testcases to tests/

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/test_nx.c | 173 ------------------------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/test_rodata.c | 86 --------------------
arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 16 ---
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2
tests/Kconfig | 16 +++
tests/Makefile | 2
tests/test_nx.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/test_rodata.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 277 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.25-rc1/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc1.orig/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc1/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
@@ -64,22 +64,6 @@ config DEBUG_RODATA
data. This is recommended so that we can catch kernel bugs sooner.
If in doubt, say "Y".

-config DEBUG_RODATA_TEST
- bool "Testcase for the DEBUG_RODATA feature"
- depends on DEBUG_RODATA
- help
- This option enables a testcase for the DEBUG_RODATA
- feature as well as for the change_page_attr() infrastructure.
- If in doubt, say "N"
-
-config DEBUG_NX_TEST
- tristate "Testcase for the NX non-executable stack feature"
- depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && m
- help
- This option enables a testcase for the CPU NX capability
- and the software setup of this feature.
- If in doubt, say "N"
-
config 4KSTACKS
bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
@@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HPET_TIMER) += hpet.o

obj-$(CONFIG_K8_NB) += k8.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MGEODE_LX) += geode_32.o mfgpt_32.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA_TEST) += test_rodata.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_NX_TEST) += test_nx.o

obj-$(CONFIG_VMI) += vmi_32.o vmiclock_32.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) += paravirt.o paravirt_patch_$(BITS).o
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/test_nx.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/test_nx.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,173 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * test_nx.c: functional test for NX functionality
- *
- * (C) Copyright 2008 Intel Corporation
- * Author: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
- * as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2
- * of the License.
- */
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/sort.h>
-#include <asm/uaccess.h>
-#include <asm/asm.h>
-
-extern int rodata_test_data;
-
-/*
- * This file checks 4 things:
- * 1) Check if the stack is not executable
- * 2) Check if kmalloc memory is not executable
- * 3) Check if the .rodata section is not executable
- * 4) Check if the .data section of a module is not executable
- *
- * To do this, the test code tries to execute memory in stack/kmalloc/etc,
- * and then checks if the expected trap happens.
- *
- * Sadly, this implies having a dynamic exception handling table entry.
- * ... which can be done (and will make Rusty cry)... but it can only
- * be done in a stand-alone module with only 1 entry total.
- * (otherwise we'd have to sort and that's just too messy)
- */
-
-
-
-/*
- * We want to set up an exception handling point on our stack,
- * which means a variable value. This function is rather dirty
- * and walks the exception table of the module, looking for a magic
- * marker and replaces it with a specific function.
- */
-static void fudze_exception_table(void *marker, void *new)
-{
- struct module *mod = THIS_MODULE;
- struct exception_table_entry *extable;
-
- /*
- * Note: This module has only 1 exception table entry,
- * so searching and sorting is not needed. If that changes,
- * this would be the place to search and re-sort the exception
- * table.
- */
- if (mod->num_exentries > 1) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: too many exception table entries!\n");
- printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: test results are not reliable.\n");
- return;
- }
- extable = (struct exception_table_entry *)mod->extable;
- extable[0].insn = (unsigned long)new;
-}
-
-
-/*
- * exception tables get their symbols translated so we need
- * to use a fake function to put in there, which we can then
- * replace at runtime.
- */
-void foo_label(void);
-
-/*
- * returns 0 for not-executable, negative for executable
- *
- * Note: we cannot allow this function to be inlined, because
- * that would give us more than 1 exception table entry.
- * This in turn would break the assumptions above.
- */
-static noinline int test_address(void *address)
-{
- unsigned long result;
-
- /* Set up an exception table entry for our address */
- fudze_exception_table(&foo_label, address);
- result = 1;
- asm volatile(
- "foo_label:\n"
- "0: call *%[fake_code]\n"
- "1:\n"
- ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
- "2: mov %[zero], %[rslt]\n"
- " ret\n"
- ".previous\n"
- _ASM_EXTABLE(0b,2b)
- : [rslt] "=r" (result)
- : [fake_code] "r" (address), [zero] "r" (0UL), "0" (result)
- );
- /* change the exception table back for the next round */
- fudze_exception_table(address, &foo_label);
-
- if (result)
- return -ENODEV;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static unsigned char test_data = 0xC3; /* 0xC3 is the opcode for "ret" */
-
-static int test_NX(void)
-{
- int ret = 0;
- /* 0xC3 is the opcode for "ret" */
- char stackcode[] = {0xC3, 0x90, 0 };
- char *heap;
-
- test_data = 0xC3;
-
- printk(KERN_INFO "Testing NX protection\n");
-
- /* Test 1: check if the stack is not executable */
- if (test_address(&stackcode)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: stack was executable\n");
- ret = -ENODEV;
- }
-
-
- /* Test 2: Check if the heap is executable */
- heap = kmalloc(64, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!heap)
- return -ENOMEM;
- heap[0] = 0xC3; /* opcode for "ret" */
-
- if (test_address(heap)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: heap was executable\n");
- ret = -ENODEV;
- }
- kfree(heap);
-
- /*
- * The following 2 tests currently fail, this needs to get fixed
- * Until then, don't run them to avoid too many people getting scared
- * by the error message
- */
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
- /* Test 3: Check if the .rodata section is executable */
- if (rodata_test_data != 0xC3) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: .rodata marker has invalid value\n");
- ret = -ENODEV;
- } else if (test_address(&rodata_test_data)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: .rodata section is executable\n");
- ret = -ENODEV;
- }
-#endif
-
-#if 0
- /* Test 4: Check if the .data section of a module is executable */
- if (test_address(&test_data)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: .data section is executable\n");
- ret = -ENODEV;
- }
-
-#endif
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void test_exit(void)
-{
-}
-
-module_init(test_NX);
-module_exit(test_exit);
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Testcase for the NX infrastructure");
-MODULE_AUTHOR("Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/test_rodata.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/test_rodata.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * test_rodata.c: functional test for mark_rodata_ro function
- *
- * (C) Copyright 2008 Intel Corporation
- * Author: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
- * as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2
- * of the License.
- */
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <asm/sections.h>
-extern int rodata_test_data;
-
-int rodata_test(void)
-{
- unsigned long result;
- unsigned long start, end;
-
- /* test 1: read the value */
- /* If this test fails, some previous testrun has clobbered the state */
- if (!rodata_test_data) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: test 1 fails (start data)\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- /* test 2: write to the variable; this should fault */
- /*
- * If this test fails, we managed to overwrite the data
- *
- * This is written in assembly to be able to catch the
- * exception that is supposed to happen in the correct
- * case
- */
-
- result = 1;
- asm volatile(
- "0: mov %[zero],(%[rodata_test])\n"
- " mov %[zero], %[rslt]\n"
- "1:\n"
- ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
- "2: jmp 1b\n"
- ".previous\n"
- ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
- " .align 16\n"
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
- " .long 0b,2b\n"
-#else
- " .quad 0b,2b\n"
-#endif
- ".previous"
- : [rslt] "=r" (result)
- : [rodata_test] "r" (&rodata_test_data), [zero] "r" (0UL)
- );
-
-
- if (!result) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: test data was not read only\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- /* test 3: check the value hasn't changed */
- /* If this test fails, we managed to overwrite the data */
- if (!rodata_test_data) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: Test 3 failes (end data)\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
- /* test 4: check if the rodata section is 4Kb aligned */
- start = (unsigned long)__start_rodata;
- end = (unsigned long)__end_rodata;
- if (start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: .rodata is not 4k aligned\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
- if (end & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: .rodata end is not 4k aligned\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Testcase for the DEBUG_RODATA infrastructure");
-MODULE_AUTHOR("Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc1/tests/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc1.orig/tests/Kconfig
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc1/tests/Kconfig
@@ -76,4 +76,20 @@ config BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST

Say N if you are unsure.

+config DEBUG_RODATA_TEST
+ bool "Testcase for the DEBUG_RODATA feature"
+ depends on X86 && DEBUG_RODATA
+ help
+ This option enables a testcase for the DEBUG_RODATA
+ feature as well as for the change_page_attr() infrastructure.
+ If in doubt, say "N"
+
+config DEBUG_NX_TEST
+ tristate "Testcase for the NX non-executable stack feature"
+ depends on X86 && DEBUG_KERNEL && m
+ help
+ This option enables a testcase for the CPU NX capability
+ and the software setup of this feature.
+ If in doubt, say "N"
+
endif # KERNEL_TESTS
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc1/tests/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc1.orig/tests/Makefile
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc1/tests/Makefile
@@ -8,3 +8,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER) += rtmutex
obj-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST) += backtracetest.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA_TEST) += test_rodata.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_NX_TEST) += test_nx.o
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc1/tests/test_nx.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc1/tests/test_nx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+/*
+ * test_nx.c: functional test for NX functionality
+ *
+ * (C) Copyright 2008 Intel Corporation
+ * Author: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2
+ * of the License.
+ */
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/sort.h>
+#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <asm/asm.h>
+
+extern int rodata_test_data;
+
+/*
+ * This file checks 4 things:
+ * 1) Check if the stack is not executable
+ * 2) Check if kmalloc memory is not executable
+ * 3) Check if the .rodata section is not executable
+ * 4) Check if the .data section of a module is not executable
+ *
+ * To do this, the test code tries to execute memory in stack/kmalloc/etc,
+ * and then checks if the expected trap happens.
+ *
+ * Sadly, this implies having a dynamic exception handling table entry.
+ * ... which can be done (and will make Rusty cry)... but it can only
+ * be done in a stand-alone module with only 1 entry total.
+ * (otherwise we'd have to sort and that's just too messy)
+ */
+
+
+
+/*
+ * We want to set up an exception handling point on our stack,
+ * which means a variable value. This function is rather dirty
+ * and walks the exception table of the module, looking for a magic
+ * marker and replaces it with a specific function.
+ */
+static void fudze_exception_table(void *marker, void *new)
+{
+ struct module *mod = THIS_MODULE;
+ struct exception_table_entry *extable;
+
+ /*
+ * Note: This module has only 1 exception table entry,
+ * so searching and sorting is not needed. If that changes,
+ * this would be the place to search and re-sort the exception
+ * table.
+ */
+ if (mod->num_exentries > 1) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: too many exception table entries!\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: test results are not reliable.\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ extable = (struct exception_table_entry *)mod->extable;
+ extable[0].insn = (unsigned long)new;
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * exception tables get their symbols translated so we need
+ * to use a fake function to put in there, which we can then
+ * replace at runtime.
+ */
+void foo_label(void);
+
+/*
+ * returns 0 for not-executable, negative for executable
+ *
+ * Note: we cannot allow this function to be inlined, because
+ * that would give us more than 1 exception table entry.
+ * This in turn would break the assumptions above.
+ */
+static noinline int test_address(void *address)
+{
+ unsigned long result;
+
+ /* Set up an exception table entry for our address */
+ fudze_exception_table(&foo_label, address);
+ result = 1;
+ asm volatile(
+ "foo_label:\n"
+ "0: call *%[fake_code]\n"
+ "1:\n"
+ ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
+ "2: mov %[zero], %[rslt]\n"
+ " ret\n"
+ ".previous\n"
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(0b,2b)
+ : [rslt] "=r" (result)
+ : [fake_code] "r" (address), [zero] "r" (0UL), "0" (result)
+ );
+ /* change the exception table back for the next round */
+ fudze_exception_table(address, &foo_label);
+
+ if (result)
+ return -ENODEV;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned char test_data = 0xC3; /* 0xC3 is the opcode for "ret" */
+
+static int test_NX(void)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ /* 0xC3 is the opcode for "ret" */
+ char stackcode[] = {0xC3, 0x90, 0 };
+ char *heap;
+
+ test_data = 0xC3;
+
+ printk(KERN_INFO "Testing NX protection\n");
+
+ /* Test 1: check if the stack is not executable */
+ if (test_address(&stackcode)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: stack was executable\n");
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+
+ /* Test 2: Check if the heap is executable */
+ heap = kmalloc(64, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!heap)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ heap[0] = 0xC3; /* opcode for "ret" */
+
+ if (test_address(heap)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: heap was executable\n");
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ }
+ kfree(heap);
+
+ /*
+ * The following 2 tests currently fail, this needs to get fixed
+ * Until then, don't run them to avoid too many people getting scared
+ * by the error message
+ */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
+ /* Test 3: Check if the .rodata section is executable */
+ if (rodata_test_data != 0xC3) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: .rodata marker has invalid value\n");
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ } else if (test_address(&rodata_test_data)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: .rodata section is executable\n");
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ }
+#endif
+
+#if 0
+ /* Test 4: Check if the .data section of a module is executable */
+ if (test_address(&test_data)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "test_nx: .data section is executable\n");
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+#endif
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void test_exit(void)
+{
+}
+
+module_init(test_NX);
+module_exit(test_exit);
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Testcase for the NX infrastructure");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc1/tests/test_rodata.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc1/tests/test_rodata.c
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+ * test_rodata.c: functional test for mark_rodata_ro function
+ *
+ * (C) Copyright 2008 Intel Corporation
+ * Author: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2
+ * of the License.
+ */
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <asm/sections.h>
+extern int rodata_test_data;
+
+int rodata_test(void)
+{
+ unsigned long result;
+ unsigned long start, end;
+
+ /* test 1: read the value */
+ /* If this test fails, some previous testrun has clobbered the state */
+ if (!rodata_test_data) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: test 1 fails (start data)\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /* test 2: write to the variable; this should fault */
+ /*
+ * If this test fails, we managed to overwrite the data
+ *
+ * This is written in assembly to be able to catch the
+ * exception that is supposed to happen in the correct
+ * case
+ */
+
+ result = 1;
+ asm volatile(
+ "0: mov %[zero],(%[rodata_test])\n"
+ " mov %[zero], %[rslt]\n"
+ "1:\n"
+ ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
+ "2: jmp 1b\n"
+ ".previous\n"
+ ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
+ " .align 16\n"
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ " .long 0b,2b\n"
+#else
+ " .quad 0b,2b\n"
+#endif
+ ".previous"
+ : [rslt] "=r" (result)
+ : [rodata_test] "r" (&rodata_test_data), [zero] "r" (0UL)
+ );
+
+
+ if (!result) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: test data was not read only\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /* test 3: check the value hasn't changed */
+ /* If this test fails, we managed to overwrite the data */
+ if (!rodata_test_data) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: Test 3 failes (end data)\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ /* test 4: check if the rodata section is 4Kb aligned */
+ start = (unsigned long)__start_rodata;
+ end = (unsigned long)__end_rodata;
+ if (start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: .rodata is not 4k aligned\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ if (end & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "rodata_test: .rodata end is not 4k aligned\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Testcase for the DEBUG_RODATA infrastructure");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/