Re: [git pull] kgdb-light -v10

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Feb 12 2008 - 11:26:37 EST

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:24:08PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Anyways the slight risk of the other CPUs eventually recovering would
> > seem a acceptable trade off versus not being able to use the debugger
> > to debug the system with hanging CPUs.
> see? There's the difference between us. The initial merge of KGDB does
> not want to include policies for nuances that pose an "acceptable slight
> risk".

Ok fine. Please implement DMA quiescence on kgdb entry then; otherwise
the code won't conform to your standards at all.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at