Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?

[Alan Cox]

> Why does the calgary driver need this?  Can we just use pci_get_device()
> instead?  Why do you need to walk the device list backwards?  Do you get
> false positives going forward?

It doesn't look to be performance critical so the driver can
pci_get_device until the end and use the final hit anyway. IDE reverse is
more problematic but nobody seems to use it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/