Re: [RFC] [PATCH] x86: Configure out compilation of Simple BootFlag support

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Le Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:29:58 +0100,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> a Ãcrit :

> no strong feelings if the ACPI guys ack it - but i suspect the
> renaming of the function from acpi_parse_sbf to sbf_acpi_parse was
> unnecessary?

I rename acpi_parse_sbf() to sbf_acpi_parse() because the function was
moved from arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c, where pretty much all functions
are named acpi_*() to the file arch/x86/kernel/bootflag.c, where all
the functions are named sbf_*(). However, I don't mind reverting that
renaming, I just thought it was cleaner, but I have no strong opinion
on it.

Any thoughts about the duplicate call to
acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_BOOT, acpi_parse_sbf) ?

Thanks for your comments,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature