Re: [BUGFIX 2/2] gdth: bugfix for the Timer at exit crash

[Boaz Harrosh]

On Wed, Feb 13 2008 at 18:45 +0200, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 18:33 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13 2008 at 17:54 +0200, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 13 2008 at 17:44 +0200, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:40 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>>> -	gdth_flush(ha);
>>>>> -
>>>> This piece doesn't look right.  gdth_flush() forces the internal cache
>>>> to disk backing.  If you remove it, you're taking the chance that the
>>>> machine will be powered off without a writeback which can cause data
>>>> corruption.
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>>
>>> Yes. 
>>> I have more problems reported, with exit, and am just sending one more patch that puts
>>> this back in. Which was tested.
>>>
>>> So I will resend this one plus one new one.
>>>
>>> Boaz
>>>
>> The gdth driver would do a register_reboot_notifier(&gdth_notifier);
>> to a gdth_halt() function, which would then redo half of what gdth_exit
>> does, and wrongly so, and crash.  
>>
>> Are we guaranteed in todays kernel that modules .exit function be called
>> on an halt or reboot? If so then there is no need for duplications and
>> the gdth_halt() should go.
> 
> No.  The __exit section is actually discardable if you promise never to
> remove the module.
> 
I don't understand please explain. 
What does a driver need to do if it needs a consistent shutdown retine?
module or built in? unload or shutdown?


> James
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/