Re: vmsplice exploits, stack protector and Makefiles

[Ingo Molnar]

* Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > if you're merging this, please do the independent parts really 
> > > independenrly. For example, the above is a patch in its own right, 
> > > and probably worth doing regardless of anything else.
> > 
> > yes. I wanted to have it tested for a bit, because the lack of use 
> > of the gcc flag means complete lack of testing coverage. The 
> > obligatory "please add a stackprotector self-test" debug feature 
> > request went to Arjan two days ago already.
> 
> Do you think that the top-lvel Makefile change is OK to merge? I would 
> like to merge it separatly to have maximum bisectability.

sure.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/