Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rt1] SMC91x: Use special_lock whenCONFIG_PREEMPT_[HARD|SOFT]IRQS

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Kevin Hilman wrote:

> The smc_special_locks should also be used when either softIRQs or hard
> IRQs are preempted which may lead to the same problems as under SMP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>

> 
> ---
>  drivers/net/smc91x.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.c b/drivers/net/smc91x.c
> index f198c49..be62616 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/smc91x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.c
> @@ -530,7 +530,8 @@ static inline void  smc_rcv(struct net_device *dev)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) ||						\
> +    defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_HARDIRQS)
>  /*
>   * On SMP we have the following problem:
>   *
> -- 
> 1.5.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/