Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and mergingprintk, take #3
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Feb 14 2008 - 21:28:47 EST
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:49:31 +0900 Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > printk is a special case, I think. It's the primary logging/debugging
> > method which can't fail and as it's mostly interpreted by human beings
> > (and developers in problematic cases), it has different maneuvering room
> > on errors - ie. it's far better to print messages w/o header or proper
> > log level than failing to print, which is quite different requirements
> > from other components.
>
> Andrew, any more comments or suggestions on how to proceed on this?
Nope.
> One
> way or the other, I think this is a problem worth solving.
There are a lot of such problems ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/