Re: [PATCH 0/4] ide: generic packet command representation

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Feb 12 2008 01:09, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
>> On a different note, i noticed ide-scsi might also need a cleanup
>> similar to the other drivers. It is next on my TODO list in case
>> you don't have anything with a higher prio.
>
>I was actually hoping that you'll continue unifying ATAPI handling...
>
>[ ide-scsi is orphaned and has (probably) unfixable problems
>  (because of having dependencies on both IDE and SCSI subsystems)
>  so it is not worth IMO but I will of course accept patches... ]

So, why is ide-scsi still in the tree? Is there some use case besides
cdrecord? (Which can use /dev/hda already without the ide-scsi blob...)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/