Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?

[yong xue]

2008/2/15, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>  > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>  > > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
>  > > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
>  > > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
>  > > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
>  >
>  > After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree.  Thanks for
>  > the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)
>
>
> Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment
>  somewhere?
>         Sam

I think  it is good  to do so.

xueyong
>
> -
>  To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
>  the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/