Re: [PATCH] Configure out doublefault exception handler (LinuxTiny)

[Matt Mackall]

On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 13:00 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > I bet there's some doublefault-handling code hiding somewhere. It's not
> > the sort of thing it'd make sense to take out of the architecture.
> 
> The big question is if it makes sense taking out of a kernel at all.
> I still think the answer is no.
> 
> Or have you considered replacing die() and show_trace() etc. with a single
> panic("the tiny gods say this won't happen") yet? That would be roughly 
> equivalent.

It's not a matter of "won't happen" so much as "not a damn thing we can
do when it does". There's very little point in having this sort of code
in a mass-market camera, phone, DVR, TV, etc. (of which there are
already millions running Linux). These devices have no console and
basically zero serviceability beyond firmware upgrades. If taking these
vestigial debugging features out means we can cram in more features that
consumers can actually see and will pay for, that's precisely what's
going to happen.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/