[PATCH] use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk
From: Glauber Costa
Date: Fri Feb 15 2008 - 15:13:37 EST
For consistency, use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk
in acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() for BUS_CHECK and DEVICE_CHECK
events
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index 923fddb..673fb92 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -890,9 +890,10 @@ acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handl
switch (event) {
case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
- printk("Processor driver received %s event\n",
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+ "Processor driver received %s event\n",
(event == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ?
- "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK");
+ "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK"));
if (!is_processor_present(handle))
break;
--
1.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/