[PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: Clean up locking protocol negotiation.

[Joel Becker]

The comparison functions for protocol negotiation (introduced in commit
d24fbcda0c4988322949df3d759f1cfb32b32953) were confusing.
Separate out the comparison and value update parts.

Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c |  102 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
index 638d2eb..de802a7 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
@@ -144,8 +144,6 @@ static int dlm_cancel_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
 				   void **ret_data);
 static int dlm_exit_domain_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
 				   void **ret_data);
-static int dlm_protocol_compare(struct dlm_protocol_version *existing,
-				struct dlm_protocol_version *request);
 
 static void dlm_unregister_domain_handlers(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm);
 
@@ -681,36 +679,48 @@ void dlm_unregister_domain(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlm_unregister_domain);
 
+/*
+ * Compare a requested locking protocol version against the current one.
+ *
+ * If the major numbers are different, they are incompatible.
+ * If the current minor is greater than the request, they are incompatible.
+ * If the current minor is less than or equal to the request, they are
+ * compatible, and the requester should run at the current minor version.
+ */
+static int dlm_protocol_compatible(struct dlm_protocol_version *existing,
+				   struct dlm_protocol_version *request)
+{
+	if (existing->pv_major != request->pv_major)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (existing->pv_minor > request->pv_minor)
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
 static int dlm_query_join_proto_check(char *proto_type, int node,
 				      struct dlm_protocol_version *ours,
 				      struct dlm_protocol_version *request)
 {
-	int rc;
-	struct dlm_protocol_version proto = *request;
+	int compatible = dlm_protocol_compatible(ours, request);
 
-	if (!dlm_protocol_compare(ours, &proto)) {
+	if (compatible)
 		mlog(0,
 		     "node %u wanted to join with %s locking protocol "
 		     "%u.%u, we respond with %u.%u\n",
 		     node, proto_type,
-		     request->pv_major,
-		     request->pv_minor,
-		     proto.pv_major, proto.pv_minor);
-		request->pv_minor = proto.pv_minor;
-		rc = 0;
-	} else {
+		     request->pv_major, request->pv_minor,
+		     ours->pv_major, ours->pv_minor);
+	else
 		mlog(ML_NOTICE,
 		     "Node %u wanted to join with %s locking "
 		     "protocol %u.%u, but we have %u.%u, disallowing\n",
 		     node, proto_type,
-		     request->pv_major,
-		     request->pv_minor,
-		     ours->pv_major,
-		     ours->pv_minor);
-		rc = 1;
-	}
+		     request->pv_major, request->pv_minor,
+		     ours->pv_major, ours->pv_minor);
 
-	return rc;
+	return compatible;
 }
 
 static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
@@ -806,21 +816,23 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
 			/* Make sure we speak compatible locking protocols.  */
 			if (dlm_query_join_proto_check("DLM", bit,
 						       &dlm->dlm_locking_proto,
-						       &query->dlm_proto)) {
-				response.packet.code =
-					JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
-			} else if (dlm_query_join_proto_check("fs", bit,
-							      &dlm->fs_locking_proto,
-							      &query->fs_proto)) {
-				response.packet.code =
-					JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
-			} else {
+						       &query->dlm_proto) &&
+			    dlm_query_join_proto_check("fs", bit,
+						       &dlm->fs_locking_proto,
+						       &query->fs_proto)) {
+				/*
+				 * We're compatible, return our
+				 * minor number
+				 */
 				response.packet.dlm_minor =
-					query->dlm_proto.pv_minor;
+					dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor;
 				response.packet.fs_minor =
-					query->fs_proto.pv_minor;
+					dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor;
 				response.packet.code = JOIN_OK;
 				__dlm_set_joining_node(dlm, query->node_idx);
+			} else {
+				response.packet.code =
+					JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -1546,29 +1558,6 @@ leave:
 }
 
 /*
- * Compare a requested locking protocol version against the current one.
- *
- * If the major numbers are different, they are incompatible.
- * If the current minor is greater than the request, they are incompatible.
- * If the current minor is less than or equal to the request, they are
- * compatible, and the requester should run at the current minor version.
- */
-static int dlm_protocol_compare(struct dlm_protocol_version *existing,
-				struct dlm_protocol_version *request)
-{
-	if (existing->pv_major != request->pv_major)
-		return 1;
-
-	if (existing->pv_minor > request->pv_minor)
-		return 1;
-
-	if (existing->pv_minor < request->pv_minor)
-		request->pv_minor = existing->pv_minor;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
  * dlm_register_domain: one-time setup per "domain".
  *
  * The filesystem passes in the requested locking version via proto.
@@ -1620,7 +1609,14 @@ retry:
 			goto retry;
 		}
 
-		if (dlm_protocol_compare(&dlm->fs_locking_proto, fs_proto)) {
+		if (dlm_protocol_compatible(&dlm->fs_locking_proto, fs_proto)) {
+			/*
+			 * We're compatible, and we run at the minor
+			 * number negotiated
+			 */
+			fs_proto->pv_minor =
+				dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor;
+		} else {
 			mlog(ML_ERROR,
 			     "Requested locking protocol version is not "
 			     "compatible with already registered domain "
-- 
1.5.3.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/