Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Feb 18 2008 - 00:38:47 EST


On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> [This is a bit late, for which I'm sorry, but I waited for things to
> calm down a bit, to have something less of a moving target.
>
> Now, following an Ingo's advice, the list has been generated directly
> out of the Bugzilla entries used for tracking the bugs. I'm going to
> release the script used for generating the list, so that it can be
> recreated by anyone on the fly.]
>
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.24 reported
> since 2.6.25-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the
> mainline I know of. ÂIf any of them have been fixed already, please
> let me know.
>
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.24, please
> let me know either and I'll add them to the list. ÂAlso, please let
> me know if any of the entries below are invalid.


question: can we please list the last known good version for each entry?
Since these are all regressions (right?) that information ought to be available
and usually helps down in narrowing causes..


--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/