Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:31:48 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > the initial plan was for a depreciation period. Sadly it was
> > untenable since the API was changing entirely to fix bugs and add a
> > really important feature (the ability to clflush the exact range
> > rather than wbinvd'ing the caches of all cpus in the system), 
> 
> Just for the record: I posted full patches to implement clflush
> support some time ago without changing any exported API. So your
> claims that changing the API was needed to implement CLFLUSH are not
> correct.

yeah of course it is possible to make things "smart" by having hidden state.
doesn't make it right.

> 
> Also I believe some assumptions behind the new API are faulty (in
> particular that the caller doesn't fully own the to be changed pages)
> and make it actually impossible to implement the cache attribute PTE
> changing operation fully correct according to the Intel x86 manual
> (which requires temporary unmap)

the Intel x86 manual explicitly only has a temporary unmap when going from a 
cached state to a write-combining state. Any other transition does not require
an unmap. Which makes this not impossible, all a cached->WC transition needs
to do is go via an intermediate UC state and the really expensive process from
the manual is not needed.


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/