Re: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, 20 of February 2008, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:26:16 -0500 (EST)
> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Do I understand this correctly?  You've got special handling for the 
> > case where a bus handler doesn't have a resume routine, but no special 
> > handling for the case where it doesn't have a suspend routine?
> 
> Hmm... There should be checks for both, but the code seems to suggest otherwise.
> 
> > Why bother to remove the device if neither routine exists (there won't be 
> > any need to revive it since the bus never got suspended)?
> 
> The bus always gets suspended. The checks are to determine if state is saved or not. If it isn't, then a suspend/resume is treated as a removal/insertion.
> 
> > And why not simply fail the suspend if the resume routine doesn't exist
> > and the suspend routine does?  Maybe with an error message in the
> > system log.
> 
> For the asymmetric case, I guess that would do. But I still want to remove devices when the bus handler has no suspend handling.

I think I know how to handle that, but there's a more urgent issue I need to
fix first.  Stay tuned. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/