Re: [PATCH [RT] 05/14] rearrange rt_spin_lock sleep
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Feb 22 2008 - 08:36:23 EST
* Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins.ml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My assumption is that the xchg() (inside update_current()) acts as an
> effective wmb(). If xchg() does not have this property, then this
> code is broken and patch 6/14 should also add a:
xchg() is a strong implicit memory barrier, it implies smp_mb().
(historic sidenote: it was the very first SMP primitive we had in
Linux.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/