Re: [PATCH] atmel_spi: support zero length transfer

[Marc Pignat]

On Saturday 23 February 2008, David Brownell wrote:
...
> No, it's fully defined.  "Crash my engine" is not OK.  The delay
> is controlled by transfer.delay_usecs ... possibly zero, which is
> best viewed as a degenerate case.
Ooops, I missed that (the delay *is* defined in transfer.delay_usecs).
So I agree, it's fully defined.

Regards

Marc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/