Re: USB OOPS 2.6.25-rc2-git1
From: David Brownell
Date: Mon Feb 25 2008 - 04:14:28 EST
On Thursday 21 February 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> > ========= CUT HERE
> > Modify EHCI irq handling on the theory that at least some of the
> > "lost" IRQs are caused by goofage between multiple lowlevel IRQ
> > acking mechanisms: try rescanning before we exit the handler, in
> > case the EHCI-internal ack (by clearing the irq status) doesn't
> > always suffice for IRQs triggered nearly back-to-back.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > --- g26.orig/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c 2008-02-20 13:26:00.000000000 -0800
> > +++ g26/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c 2008-02-20 13:54:37.000000000 -0800
> > @@ -638,6 +638,8 @@ static irqreturn_t ehci_irq (struct usb_
> > return IRQ_NONE;
> > }
> >
> > +retrigger:
> > +
> > /* clear (just) interrupts */
> > ehci_writel(ehci, status, &ehci->regs->status);
> > cmd = ehci_readl(ehci, &ehci->regs->command);
> > @@ -725,6 +727,12 @@ dead:
> >
> > if (bh)
> > ehci_work (ehci);
> > +
> > + status = ehci_readl(ehci, &ehci->regs->status);
> > + status &= INTR_MASK;
> > + if (status)
> > + goto retrigger;
> > +
> > spin_unlock (&ehci->lock);
> > if (pcd_status & STS_PCD)
> > usb_hcd_poll_rh_status(hcd);
>
> There's one little problem here. As a result of this change, the line
> where pcd_status gets set (not shown in this patch) needs to be changed
> to:
>
> pcd_status |= (status & STS_PCD);
Actually, no change is needed. It's initialized to zero, then
set to "status" given "if (status & STS_PCD)", and never cleared.
So if it's ever set, it stays set...
>
> Then the test shown above can be simplified to:
>
> if (pcd_status)
True with the current code too ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/