Re: bcm43xx regression in 2.6.24 (with patch)

[Pekka J Enberg]

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > Neither of which seem like acceptable solutions for a 2.6.23 -> 2.6.24
> > _regression_. Or maybe I am just too naive to believe Linus' statement
> > on not letting the kernel regress...
> 
> So, please sign-off the patch that we have, if you think it's right
> and doesn't cause more regressions.

I did look at the patch and can gladly add a:

Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

But this seems backwards. It was _your_ commit that broke the setup and 
the patch touches a driver _you're_ maintaining.

So can we just revert commit 753f492093da7a40141bfe083073400f518f4c68 
("[B44]: port to native ssb support") from 2.6.24 and you can add it back 
to 2.6.25 if the problem indeed does go away?

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/