Re: [PATCH 2/3] kill_pid_info_as_uid: don't use security_task_kill()

[Casey Schaufler]

--- Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> ...
> > 
> > I think we should omit the permission checks completely, the task which
> does
> > ioctl(USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB) explicitly asks to send the signal to it, we
> should
> > not deny the signal even if the task changes its credentials in any way.
> 
> If we are applying checks based on uid/gid to protect suid/sgid
> programs, then we ought to also invoke the LSM hook to allow protection
> of other credential-changing transformations, like SELinux context
> transitions.  You either remove all checking or none, please.  And if
> all, what's the rationale?

Perhaps more important to my mind is what lead the developers of
this code to go to such significant lengths to provide this access
check in the first place. Why was it considered sufficiently important?
I concur that it's an ugly bit of hackery, but someone must have felt
it was necessary or they wouldn't have done it.


Casey Schaufler
casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/