Re: [patch 5/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Paul Jackson wrote:

> David wrote:
> +static nodemask_t mpol_relative_nodemask(const nodemask_t *orig,
> +					 const nodemask_t *rel)
> +{
> +	nodemask_t ret;
> +	nodemask_t tmp;
> 
> Could you avoid needing the nodemask_t 'ret' on the stack, by passing
> in a "nodemask_t *" pointer to where you want the resulting nodemask_t
> written, rather than by returning it by value?
> 
>  static void mpol_relative_nodemask(nodemask_t *ret, const nodemask_t *orig,
> 					 const nodemask_t *rel)
> 

Done, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/