Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

[Li Zefan]

Paul Menage wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > - foo doesn't show up in /proc/cgroups
>>
>>  Or we can print out the disable flag, maybe this will be better?
>>  Because we can distinguish from disabled and not compiled in from
>>
>> /proc/cgroups.
> 
> Certainly possible, if people felt it was useful.
> 
>>  > - foo isn't auto-mounted if you mount all cgroups in a single hierarchy
>>  > - foo isn't visible as an individually mountable subsystem
>>
>>  You mentioned in a previous mail if we mount a disabled subsystem we
>>  will get an error. Here we just ignore the mount option. Which makes
>>  more sense ?
>>
> 
> No, we don't ignore the mount option - we give an error since it
> doesn't refer to a valid subsystem. (And in the first case there is no
> mount option).
> 

You are write, -ENOENT will be returned in this case. I made a mistake when
reading the prototype patch, thanks for the clarification. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/