Re: [patch 2.6.25-rc2-git 2/2] atmel_tc clocksource/clockevent code

[David Brownell]

On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > Another way to address that rm9200 issue would be to just rate
> > the TC clockevent source lower than the one based on the system
> > timer, so it's set up but never enabled ... and remember "t2_clk",
> > calling clk_enable() only when that clockevent device is active.
> > 
> > That would address one half of the suspend/resume equation too,
> > ensuring that clock is disabled during suspend...
> 
> Yes, we could probably do that. Which means we can just remove all the
> ifdeffery?

There'd still be the #ifdef for CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS,
unless all the platforms get updated to support that.  Right
now it's a "patches available but not merged" situation.


> > The other half being:  how to clk_disable(t0_clk) during system
> > suspend?  (And t1_clk on some systems.)  There's currently no
> > clocksource.set_mode() call; evidently there's an assumption that
> > such counters cost no power, so they can always be left running.
> 
> Yes...that would be a clocksource core issue I guess. Better leave that
> for later...

My thoughts exactly.  ;)

Plus a bit of puzzlement why that didn't trigger at least a
warning during AT91 suspend testing.  There used to be warnings
there about clocks which were wrongly left enabled...

- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/