Re: [RFC][PATCH] page reclaim throttle take2

[Balbir Singh]

David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
>> Let's forget node hotplug for the moment, but what if someone
>>
>> 1. Changes the machine configuration and adds more nodes, do we expect the
>> kernel to be recompiled? Or is it easier to update /etc/sysctl.conf?
>> 2. Uses fake NUMA nodes and increases/decreases the number of nodes across
>> reboots. Should the kernel be recompiled?
>>
> 
> That is why the proposal was made to make this a static configuration 
> option, such as CONFIG_NUM_RECLAIM_THREADS_PER_NODE, that will handle both 
> situations.
> 

You mentioned CONFIG_NUM_RECLAIM_THREADS_PER_CPU and not
CONFIG_NUM_RECLAIM_THREADS_PER_NODE. The advantage with syscalls is that even if
we get the thing wrong, the system administrator has an alternative. Please look
through the existing sysctl's and you'll see what I mean. What is wrong with
providing the flexibility that comes with sysctl? We cannot possibly think of
all situations and come up with the right answer for a heuristic. Why not come
up with a default and let everyone use what works for them?


-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/