Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Wed Feb 27 2008 - 16:59:36 EST
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:30:59PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:16:30PM -0800, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>>> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> X86_HT is used for hyperthreading or multicore on 32-bit.
>>> The X86_HT on 64-bit is different from 32-bit, it means hyperthreading only.
>>> And X86_HT is not used on 64-bit except from cpu/initel_cacheinfo.c.
>>>
>>> Unify X86_HT for hyperthreading or multicore.
>>> Turn X86_HT on when X86_64 and SMP are enabled.
>>
>> Please fix it properly instead - fiddling around with it the way you do
>> only asks for trouble in the future.
>>
>> What we need are two different variables for:
>> - hyperthreading and
>> - multicore
>
> He does, and calls them SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC respectively.
These are the already existing scheduler related variables that are
only a part of the X86_HT usages.
> It's not particularly clear to me what X86_HT is meant to be used for
> anymore at all.
grep through the source code and you find it is sometimes used for
hyperthreading and sometimes for multicore.
I don't care whether X86_HT gets splitted or perhaps even removed, but
any change to it should remove the status quo of it having two different
semantics.
> -hpa
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/