Re: [2.6 patch] selinux/netlabel.c should #include "netlabel.h"

[Paul Moore]

On Wednesday 27 February 2008 4:55:43 pm Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 04:42:57PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 February 2008 4:20:42 pm Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Every file should include the headers containing the externs for
> > > its global code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > It doesn't _need_ the file in the strictest sense, the header file
> > is just there for the core SELinux code to call into the
> > NetLabel/SELinux glue code (what is in
> > security/selinux/netlabel.c).  However, if this is to conform
> > better to kernel coding policy (I assume that is the case here?)
> > then that is fine with me.
>
> I'm not claiming it needs it.
>
> But with this #include gcc can check that the prototypes in
> netlabel.h match the functions in netlabel.c
>
> The bugs this catches are rare, but when you have such a bug it can
> be nasty to debug.

Good point, hadn't thought of that - thanks.  

> > Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>

-- 
paul moore
linux security @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/