Re: epoll and shared fd's

[Michael Kerrisk]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:16:30 +0100, Bodo Eggert said:
>  > Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > >               file  handle  have  been  closed.  This means that
>  > >               even after a file descriptor that is  part  of  an
>  > >               epoll  set has been closed, events may be reported
>  > >               for that file descriptor if other file descriptors
>  > >               referring  to the same underlying file description
>  > >               remain open.
>
>  Is it worth making special mention of the case where a process gets events
>  for a FD that it has closed, because a parent or child process still has
>  an inherited copy of the FD still open?

I'm not sure -- perhaps under a BUGS section?  Did you read my reply
about this point in the thread "Re: epoll design problems with common
fork/exec patterns"?

Cheers,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Maintainer of the Linux man-pages project
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Want to report a man-pages bug?  Look here:
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/