On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:38:37 -0800 "David J. Wilder" <dwilder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
These patches provide a kernel tracing interface called "trace".
ChangeLog:
-Updated to 2.6.25-rc2-mm1
-Removed sem_watch example, to hard to maintain.
-Added a new example that demonstrates per-cpu continuous tracing
of data generated using marker probes.
-Removed inline from relay patch.
-Moved examples into /sample directory.
The motivation for "trace" is to:
- Provide a simple set of tracing primitives that will utilize the high-
performance and low-overhead of relayfs for passing traces data from
kernel to user space.
- Provide a common user interface for managing kernel traces.
- Allow for binary as well as ascii trace data.
- Incorporate features from the systemtap runtime that are
useful to others.
So... what's the story on this versus lttng?
Is there some userspace code available for people to test this? Maybe it's
mentioned and I missed it.
It'd be interesting to see a writeup of the proposed kernel<->userspace
interfaces. I see a description of kernel-internal interfaces, but how do
users use it?
I see it uses things from blktrace. Can blktrace be switched over to being
a client of this code?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/