Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation

[Paul Jackson]

Max K wrote:
> I like the concept of the "boot" set. But we still need a separate "system"
> flag. Users should not have to move cpu back into the "boot" set to allow for
> kernel (irqs, etc) activity on it. And it's just more explicit and clear that way.

Good point -- a "boot" cpuset might be 4 CPUs out of 256 CPUs, just for running
the classic Unix load (daemons, init, login, ...).  But irq's might need to go
to most CPUs, except for some (dare I use the word) isolated CPUs.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/