Re: [PATCH 08/11] NFS: Introduce lifecycle management for labelattribute.

[Dave Quigley]

The only benefit I can see for this is to make sure we don't leak any of
these labels. I can't find a reasonable way to match these up though so
it will just give us a hint that we are leaking something. 

Dave


On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 10:00 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Dave Quigley wrote:
> 
> > A question about the debug configuration here. Exactly what information
> > are we looking to get for debugging. If we want line/file/function that
> > these are called on then I need a macro wrapper for the allocation as
> > well. If that is the case I'm guessing we always define the macros
> > nfs_fattr_alloc and nfs_fattr_fini and just make the internal functions
> > static inline so they can be compiled away when !CONFIG_SECURITY.
> 
> Well, a WARN_ON will give you a stack trace.  It's up to you -- how much 
> debugging do you think this will need now? 
> 
> 
> - James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/