Re: [PATCH 11/12] Generic semaphore implementation

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:43:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> err, we'd better tell the arch maintainers than we just deleted all their
> sempahore code.
     ^^  I'm so glad it's not just me who makes that typo.  I actually
grepped for it before sending the patches out.

I did already send it to linux-arch back in January or so.  But a
reminder won't hurt.

> yummy summary:
> 
>  254 files changed, 386 insertions(+), 7827 deletions(-)

Yeah, that's quite attractive ;-)

> Yes, let's get this into linux-next if poss please.  If mainline later
> breaks for some architecture, well, we did our best..

It _should_ only be build breakage.  I guess we'll see.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/