Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Roman Zippel wrote:
>
> I'd suggest to move PREEMPT_RCU back to Kconfig.preempt and if you really
> need the second symbol leave this behind (maybe with a comment):
>
> config CLASSIC_RCU
> 	def_bool !PREEMPT_RCU

Ah, OK, you are saying that we should only show the option for
PREEMPT_RCU? If selected, we use that and if not, we default to
CLASSIC_RCU.

I guess that can work.

-- Steve

>
> Once there are more options, we can still look for a better place...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/