Re: [PATCH] x86_64 ia32 syscall restart fix
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Feb 29 2008 - 12:38:08 EST
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> and one area where commit messages are totally important IMO is bug
> forensics. For every regression we find we try to put in the commit ID
> that broke it. Information like that is vital to have a good (and
> objective) picture about how bugs get into and get out of the kernel
> and it also alerts us to change/improve infrastructure if certain
> categories of bugs happen too often.
another "commit space" feature Thomas and me was thinking about was to
put in "backport suggestions" for -stable the following way:
Backport-suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
and the -stable tree could then notice it, and once it has been
backported, they could put in their "done" notifiers via:
Backported-from: 67ca7bde2e9d3516b5
or:
Backport-rejected: 67ca7bde2e9d3516b5
This way the act of suggesting backports to the -stable tree (and their
rejection) could be fully automated, and the answer to the rather
difficult question:
"has -stable picked up all backport requests, and if not, why?"
could be scripted up.
A further (small) variation of this scheme: if a fix is noticed to be a
backport candidate later on, or a user notices that a fix that has gone
upstream fixes a -stable bug too, this information could be signalled in
a separate, special, empty commit:
Backport-suggested-by: 67ca7bde2e9d35, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
this way subsystem maintainers could have a reliable protocol of getting
fixes integrated into -stable - purely via the commit messages in your
tree.
... but then we decided that handling x86 architecture maintainance is
work enough already, without us complicating our own life any further
;-)
But the idea is solid nevertheless, and if everyone did it the -stable
guys would have a much easier life as well :-) [ We could start doing it
in x86.git if there's general agreement and if the -stable guys
specifically asked for this. ]
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/