Re: Interactivity issue in 2.6.25-rc3
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Feb 29 2008 - 13:37:10 EST
* Carlos R. Mafra <crmafra2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > and obviously, even if you only 'feel' long delays that's too an
> > anomaly by definition, no matter what the scripts say about it. It
> > might even be a scheduler anomaly as well: for example if the
> > scheduler clock has an anomaly - on which the delay statistics are
> > based too.
>
> But if the scripts say all 'se.wait_max' are < 40 msecs than it is not
> CFS' fault, right? Even if it takes 3 seconds for a typed letter to
> appear in the terminal?
yeah, in 99.9% of the cases it's not the scheduler's fault.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/