Re: [RFC/PATCH] cpuset: cpuset irq affinities

[Paul Jackson]

Max wrote:
> Yeah, I'd prefer it to be along with cpusets. As I mentioned will need similar 
> mechanisms for other things besides irqs for complete isolation. Creating a 
> separate group for each sounds like an overkill.

One can combine cgroups into a single hierarchy.

If we had irqs and these similar mechanisms you have in mind each in
their separate cgroup subsystem, and if you normally wanted to deal
with them all in a single hierarchy, then you can mount those cgroup
subsystems together.

I've manage to avoid learning how to use cgroups, so you might want
to ask Paul Menage (just added to the cc list) how to do that, if the
Documentation/cgroups.txt isn't sufficient.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/