Re: [patch 6/6] mempolicy: update NUMA memory policy documentation

From: David Rientjes
Date: Fri Feb 29 2008 - 20:15:43 EST


On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> David Rientjes wrote:
> > Updates Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt and
> > Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.txt to describe optional mempolicy mode
> > flags.
> >
> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.txt | 12 +++
> > Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt | 131
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
> > b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
> > --- a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
>
> > @@ -231,6 +234,80 @@ Components of Memory Policies
> > the temporary interleaved system default policy works in this
> > mode.
> > + Linux memory policy supports the following optional mode flag:
>
> flags:
>
> > +
> > + MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES: This flag specifies that the nodemask passed by
> > + the user should not be remapped if the task or VMA's set of allowed
> > + nodes changes after the memory policy has been defined.
> > +
> > + Without this flag, anytime a mempolicy is rebound because of a
> > + change in the set of allowed nodes, the node (Preferred) or
> > + nodemask (Bind, Interleave) is remapped to the new set of
> > + allowed nodes. This may result in nodes being used that were
> > + previously undesired.
> > +
> > + With this flag, if the user specified nodes overlap with the
>
> user-specified
>
> > + nodes allowed by the task's cpuset, then the memory policy is
> > + applied to their intersection. If the two sets of nodes do not
> > + overlap, the Default policy is used.
> > +
> > + For example, consider a task that is attached to a cpuset with
> > + mems 1-3 that sets an Interleave policy over the same set. If
> > + the cpuset's mems change to 3-5, the Interleave will now occur
> > + over nodes 3, 4, and 5. With this flag, however, since only node
> > + 3 is allowed from the user's nodemask, the "interleave" only
> > + occurs over that node. If no nodes from the user's nodemask are
> > + now allowed, the Default behavior is used.
> > +
> > + MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES cannot be used with MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES.
> > +
>

Andrew, please fold this into
mempolicy-update-numa-memory-policy-documentation.patch if this patchset is
added to -mm.

Corrects two errors in Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt as identified by
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>.

Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
--- a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
+++ b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ Components of Memory Policies
the temporary interleaved system default policy works in this
mode.

- Linux memory policy supports the following optional mode flag:
+ Linux memory policy supports the following optional mode flags:

MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES: This flag specifies that the nodemask passed by
the user should not be remapped if the task or VMA's set of allowed
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ Components of Memory Policies
allowed nodes. This may result in nodes being used that were
previously undesired.

- With this flag, if the user specified nodes overlap with the
+ With this flag, if the user-specified nodes overlap with the
nodes allowed by the task's cpuset, then the memory policy is
applied to their intersection. If the two sets of nodes do not
overlap, the Default policy is used.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/