On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:29:48AM +0530, Balaji Rao wrote:[snip]On Saturday 08 March 2008 04:15:22 pm Laurent Riffard wrote:Le 07.03.2008 04:18, Stephen Rothwell a ??crit :Hi all,I've got a lot of "Slab corruption" with next-20060307 (actually a
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
continuous flow of warnings) whereas next-20060306 is fine.
Hi greg,
I did a bisection:
5a428808720b31026890d3ff71fbd891d9a94fd6 is first bad commit
commit 5a428808720b31026890d3ff71fbd891d9a94fd6
Author: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Mar 6 22:23:18 2008 +0530
kobjects: mark cleaned up kobjects as unitialized
When I remove only the kvm-intel module without removing the kvm module
itself, I get an error saying that a kobject is trying to be
reinitialized. Its because of the fact that kvm reuses a kobject in
kvm_init when calling sysdev_register.
This patch fixes kobject_cleanup by marking the kobject as
uninitialized when we cleanup to allow kobjects to be reused.
Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
:040000 040000 c15d08d966391dec783d137558fad66d9c2da57b
: eddea2ec69c014370cf98cc2fc7e24a8dc301e70 M lib
.config attached
~~
laurent
Apparently, its the wrong place to mark the kobject as uninitialized as the kobject could be freed by then. I've now moved it to the top of kobject_cleanup(). This fixes the problem for me.
laurent, can you please revert the above commit , and apply this patch ? Does it help ?
Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@xxxxxxxxx>
--
diff --git a/lib/kobject.c b/lib/kobject.c
index d784dae..a1f87bd 100644
--- a/lib/kobject.c
+++ b/lib/kobject.c
@@ -548,6 +548,9 @@ static void kobject_cleanup(struct kobject *kobj)
pr_debug("kobject: '%s' (%p): %s\n",
kobject_name(kobj), kobj, __FUNCTION__);
+ /* Set the state to uninitialized */
+ kobj->state_initialized = 0;
+
if (t && !t->release)
pr_debug("kobject: '%s' (%p): does not have a release() "
"function, it is broken and must be fixed.\n",
Doh, this is correct, sorry about that, I'll fix this up properly...
thanks,
greg k-h