Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the signr"calculation"

[Ingo Molnar]

* Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm not sure print-fatal-signals was really ever intended for 
> non-coredump signals.  It doesn't seem like it would be all that 
> useful.  It's probably even undesireable for every normal C-c killing 
> something to cause a printk.

correct. We used to have them for SIGKILL but even that was confusing to 
users - so the intent very much is to only have them for truly 
unexpected, non-user generated and 'fatal', coredump-generating signals.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/