Re: ADT746X: logical-bitwise & confusion in set_max_duty_at_crit()
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Mon Mar 10 2008 - 04:08:10 EST
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:46 +0100, Colin Leroy wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:04:33 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > logical-bitwise & confusion
>
> Looks good to me, but I'm not really maintaining that anymore :-)
> I'm not sure who does, Cc:ing Benjamin as he'll probably know.
Nobody is U suspect...
Send it to the list linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, it should be picked up
anyway.
Ben.
> > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c b/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c
> > index 9587869..8ea7da2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c
> > @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static ssize_t set_max_duty_at_crit(struct device
> > *dev, struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> > struct adt7473_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > int temp = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
> > - temp = temp && 0xFF;
> > + temp &= 0xFF;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> > data->max_duty_at_overheat = temp;
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/