Re: [PATCH 1/6] gxfb: create DC/VP/FP-specific handlers rather thanusing readl/writel

[Andrew Morton]

On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 20:48:26 -0500
Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +#define read_dc(reg)		readl(par->dc_regs + (reg))
> +#define write_dc(reg, val)	writel((val), par->dc_regs + (reg))
> +
> +#define read_vp(reg)		readl(par->vid_regs + (reg))
> +#define write_vp(reg, val)	writel((uint32_t) (val), \
> +					par->vid_regs + (reg))
> +
> +#define read_fp(reg)		readl(par->vid_regs + (reg))
> +#define write_fp(reg, val)	writel((uint32_t) (val), \
> +					par->vid_regs + (reg))
> +

Not very nice, sorry.  They're macros, and macros rather suck.  And they
implicitly rely upon the caller having some variable called "par" in scope.

It would be much nicer to do

/*
 * documentation goes here
 */
static inline u32 read_dc(struct geodefb_par *par, int reg)
{
	return readl(par->dc_regs, reg);
}

no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/