Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet

[Artur Skawina]

Artur Skawina wrote:
> Now, if you add snapshots to the backing store it suddenly becomes much
> more interesting -- you no longer need to put so much trust in all the
> hw. Should the device fail for whatever reason then you just rollback to
> the last good snapshot upon restart. No corrupted fs, no fsck; you lose
> some newly written data (that you couldn't recover w/o a snapshot anyway),
> but can trust the rest of it (assuming you trust the fs and storage hw,
> but that's no different then w/o ramback).

or you could keep two devices as backing store, use one and switch to the
other when the fs is consistent. This could as simple as noticing zero
dirty data in the ramdisk or, if something is constantly writing to it,
reacting periodically to some barrier (needs cow/doublebuffering in order
to not throttle the writer, but you already do this). Means ramdisk can
be as large as 1/2 the stable storage and a bit more i/o (resyncing after
switch to the other device), but gives you two copies of the data; one
stable and one that can be used to recover newer data should you need to.

artur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/